Power System Modeling for Power-By-Wire Applications

Posted by on Oct 24, 2009 in Aircraft, Contracts, Power Systems, SBIR Phase III | 0 comments

Type of Award: SBIR Phase III, CPFF, Level of Effort (LOE) / Task Ordered (TO) Contract Number: NAS3-27203 Lead-In Phase II: NAS3-25962 Awards: TO 001: Contract Operations, 11/22/93 TO 002: Modeling of DC Link Resonant Mode Controller, 2/18/94 TO 003: Modeling of ARCP Converter, 5/16/94 TO 004: AC Resonant Link Modeling, 5/16/94 TO 005: Modeling and Simulation of DC Restorer Motor Controllers, 2/6/95 TO 006: Modeling of Power Factor and Torque/Amp Control for an Induction Motor, 6/27/95 Subcontractors: Purdue and UMR Agency: NASA LeRC Status: Power-By-Wire Program discontinued on 1/6/97 by NASA Headquarters Period: 11/22/93 to 1/6/97 Principal Investigator: Steve Pekarek Brief Description and Purpose: In the early 1990’s NASA assembled a team made up of several industries in the aircraft community to investigate power-by–wire (more-electric) applications for aircraft. PC Krause and Associates Inc. (PCKA) was contracted to conduct analysis and modeling with the goal of developing an end-to-end simulation of a team developed example more-electric aircraft. Although the team assembled and the goal of the program were appropriate, NASA Headquarters reduced the funding soon after the start of the effort followed by a three month work stoppage  and soon after, the program was discontinued. TO 002 Reports: “Modeling for DC Link Resonant Mode Controller”, 1/3/95 “Shunt Filter Design for a DC Resonant Link Based Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive”, 5/4/95 TO 003 Reports: Only Monthly Status Reports available in file. TO 004 Reports: “AC Resonant Link Modeling”, 8/8/94 TO 005 Reports: Only Monthly Status Reports available in file. TO 006 Reports: Only Monthly Status Reports available in...

Read More

More Electrical Aircraft (MEA) Electrical System Modeling, Simulation, and Performance Analysis

Posted by on Oct 24, 2009 in Aircraft, Contracts, Electric Machine, Electronics, Paul Krause, Power Systems, SBIR Phase III | 0 comments

Type of Award: SBIR Phase III, CPFF (In response to BAA) Lead-In Phase II: N61533-89-C-0062 Contract Number: F33615-93-C-2361 Subcontractors: Purdue and Northrop Agency: U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Status: Completed Period: 9/30/93 to 2/19/01 Principal Investigator: Paul Krause Brief Description and Purpose: PCKA and the Aircraft Division of Northrop Corporation teamed to develop and validate component simulations applicable to the More Electric Aircraft (MEA) concept. The overall goal was to provide the Air Force and the aircraft industry with computer simulation support and in-house simulation capability so that MEA power systems would be investigated before, during, and after construction. To achieve this goal, it is proposed to develop detailed hybrid and detailed digital as well as reduced-order computer models of the main components of the MADMEL system. The component simulations were modular and generic in nature so that the models could be used to simulate these components with different ratings and in different system arrangements. Final Report: MEA Electrical System Modeling, Simulation, and Performance Analysis This report is 230 pages in length wherein detailed and reduced order models of the MADMEL components are developed. The components include (1) synchronous machine, (2) switched reluctance generator, (3) PWM inverter fed induction motor, (4) electro-hydrostatic actuator, and (5) MADMEL electrical load simulator. Reports in Paper Form: Modeling and Simulation of  UAV Power System Analysis of Switched Capacitance Machinery for Aerospace...

Read More

Simulation and Analysis of Shipboard Power Systems

Posted by on Oct 24, 2009 in Contracts, Naval, Paul Krause, Power Systems, SBIR Phase III | 0 comments

Type of Award: SBIR Phase III, Level-of-Effort (LOE) / Technical Instruction (TI) Contract Number: N00024-93-C-4180 Lead-In Phase II: N61533-89-C-0062 Awards: TI 001: IPS Component / System Model Development, 10/1/93 TI 002: ZEDS Component / System Model Development, 2/1/94 TI 003: IPS Propulsion Component / System Model Development, 3/2/94 TI 004: PM Propulsion Motor Test Facility Simulation Assessment and Validation, 2/21/95 TI 005: DC ZEDS Test Facility Simulation Assessment and Validation, 3/6/95 TI 006: Integrated Power System Simulation Model Development, 6/1/95 TI 007: Simulation Library for the More Electric Program, 3/8/96 TI 008: Integrated Power System Simulation Model Development, 6/27/96 TI 009: Integrated Power System Simulation Model Development, 12/30/96 TI 010: F/A-18 C/D Electrical Systems Simulation Model Development, 5/28/97 TI 011: Integrated Power System Simulation Model Development, 11/18/97 TI 012: IPS Electrical System Simulation Model Development, 2/9/98 TI 013: IPS Future Concepts Model Validation Test Identification, 12/26/99 TI 014: IPS Future Concepts Simulation and Analysis, 1/1/00 Subcontractors: Purdue and UMR Agency: U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command Status: Completed Period: 9/14/93 to 6/30/00 Principal Investigator: Paul Krause Brief Description and Purpose: During the Industry Brief given by the Naval Sea Systems Command at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Annapolis Detachment on May 4 and 5, 1993 the Advanced Surface Machinery Programs (ASMP) were presented and discussed. The approach of concurrent design and development (concurrent engineering) was emphasized. Since accurate computer simulation could be used advantageously in all stages of component and system design and development, simulation becomes a necessity if this type of engineering approach is to succeed. Since 1987, PC Krause and Associates (PCKA) had been involved in the development of computer models for the Navy (NSWC). The computer models which were being used by NSWC to design and investigate Navy related power systems were developed and originally coded in ASCL by PCKA. The need for simulation in the Navy’s concurrent engineering approach to the Advanced Surface Machinery Programs was made very apparent at the Industry Brief. Coupling this with the fact that (PCKA) was instrumental in developing the simulation capability of NSWC provided the impetus for this contract. PCKA had not become involved with the manufacturers other than through or with the Government agency. This enabled PCKA to provide an independent evaluation. As a result of this independence and the fact that PCKA had an excellent working relationship with industry allowed PCKA to play its first role as an honest broker. TI 001 Report: “IPS Component/System Model Development: (Kaman Electromagnetics Corporation (KEC) Advanced Developmental Model (ADM))  Generator/Rectifier System”, 3/26/94 (Purdue/UMR/PCKA) TI 002 Reports: “Computer Models of Shipboard Electrical (Zonal Electric Distribution (ZED)) Power Systems”, 8/23/95 (Purdue/PCKA) “ZEDS Components/System Model Development: Synchronous Machine-Power Supply (Detailed and Reduced-Order) Modeling”, 1/6/95 (UMR) TI 003 Reports: “ IPS Propulsion Component/System Model Development: Modeling of KEC  Permanent-Magnet Generator (and Rectifier System)”, 1/4/95 (PCKA) “IPS Component/System Model Development: A Flux-Weakening Strategy for Current-Regulated Surface...

Read More

Performance Analysis of Total Machine System and Electrical Power System Concepts and Associated Technologies

Posted by on Oct 24, 2009 in Contracts, Electronics, Naval, Paul Krause, Power Systems, SBIR Phase III | 0 comments

Type of Award: SBIR Phase III, Level of Effort (LOE)/Delivery Order (DO) Contract Number: N61533-94-D-0028 Lead-In Phase II: N61533-898-C-0062 Awards: DO 001: DO 002: DO 003: DO 004: Subcontractors: Purdue, UMR, and UWM Agencies: U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center Status: Completed. Period: 6/30/94 to 6/30/99 Principal Investigator: Paul Krause Brief Description and Purpose: It became clear that computer simulation would play a major role in the Navy’s Advanced Surface Machinery and the Advanced Electrical Power System programs at CDNSWC. In particular, accurate computer simulations could be used advantageously in all stages of component and system design and development. Simulation is a necessity if concurrent design and development (concurrent engineering) is to succeed. Since 1987, P C. Krause and Associates (PCKA) had been involved in the development of computer models for the Navy (NSWC). The need for simulation in the Navy’s engineering approach to advanced machinery and electrical systems coupled with the fact that PCKA had been instrumental in developing the present simulation capability of NSWC provided the basis for this contract. PCKA provided the Navy with engineering services in the area of detailed and reduced-order modeling and analysis of components/systems which were being contemplated and/or developed in the advanced machinery and electrical systems programs. Since PCKA had not  been  involved with manufacturers other than through or with the Government agency. This enables PCKA to provide an independent evaluation since the personnel associated with PCKA had not received corporate grants or contracts from manufacturers which could be construed as a conflict of interest. Here, again, PCKA was successfully casted  in the role of an honest broker. DO 001 Reports: “Modeling of EATON Advanced Modular Power (AMP) Converters”, 11/15/94, 4/11/95, 4/24/95, 1/18/96, and 3/7/96 “Induction Motor Drive Simulation”, 8/2/95 DO 002 Reports: “Modeling of (GE’s) Six and Twelve Phase Generator/Rectifier Systems”, 1/18/96 “Modeling of the Westinghouse 6-Phase Generator/Rectifier”,  3/7/96 DO 003 Reports: “Short-Circuit Response of Westinghouse  6-Phase Generator/Rectifier System”, 7/14/97 “Modeling Update of Westinghouse  6-Phase Generator/Rectifier System”, 7/20/97, 11/8/99, 11/10/99 “Modeling of the Bettis Compatibility Test Facility with Updated Models of the PSG and Eaton Inverters and Converters”, 7/6/98 “Westinghouse Six-Phase Generator/Rectifier System DC Impedance Measurements Report”, 7/27/98 “Final Update of PSG Inverter and EATON Converter and Inverter Models”, 9/26/99 DO 004 Reports: “Emergency Diesel Generator Faulted Diode Report”, 1/11/99 “Multi-Level Power Conversion; Modeling and Analysis”, 12/29/99 “Modeling of the Westinghouse Excitation/Generation Systems”, 1/4/00 “Dynamic Average-Value Modeling of a Four-Level Drive System”, IEEE-IAS Paper,...

Read More

Dynamic Simulation of High-Power Machinery Systems

Posted by on Oct 24, 2009 in Contracts, Electronics, Naval, Paul Krause, Power Systems, Propulsion, SBIR Phase III | 0 comments

Type of Award: SBIR Phase III, IDIQ, CPFF, Level of Effort (LOE)/Delivery Order (DO) Contract Number: N00167-99-D-0100 Lead-In Phase II: N00024-97-4097 Awards: DO 001: DO 002: DO 003: Subcontractors: Purdue and UMR: Agencies: U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center and U.S. Naval Sea Command Status: Completed. Period: 9/30/99 to 9/11/01 Principal Investigator: Paul Krause Brief Description and Purpose: In the mid to late 1990’s, PC Krause and Associates (PCKA), Purdue University, the University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR), and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) had been extensively involved, as a group, in research, analysis, simulation, and design of power-electronic based systems for government agencies (Navy, Air Force, NASA, and the Army) interested in the more-electric initiative program. This group, of which PCKA was the small business arm, evolved naturally from a need to combine expertise in order to conduct the required work which has involved a large spectrum of power/drive systems ranging from spacecraft to tactical vehicles. The commonalities that exist between these many systems in configuration and components became very apparent. This sole-source contract was the first effort by the Navy to encourage interagency interaction in sharing the results of the research and engineering projects common to shipboard power systems and to provide a convenient funding vehicle to encourage shared funding, among these agencies, for projects of mutual interest. Clearly, this is in keeping with the emphasis on interaction and consolidation of government-funded programs. This contract was one of the first steps toward the goal of establishing an inter-agency funded group made up of universities, government agencies (laboratories), and industry and focused on the research, analysis, design, and development of electric power systems. DO 001 Reports: “Modeling of the Westinghouse Excitation/Generation Systems”, 6/24/02 DO 002 Reports: “Monthly Status Reports”. DO 003 Reports: Naval Combat Survivability Reports (in paper form) “Component Modeling-Ship Service Converter Module”, 5/1/01 “Component Modeling-Power Supply”, 5/1/01 “Component Modeling-Ship Service Inverter Module”, 5/11/01 “Component Modeling-Motor Controller”, 5/11/01 “Component Modeling-Constant Power Load”, 5/12/01 “Generation and Propulsion Testbed Architecture”, 6/6/01 “DC ZEDS Testbed Architecture” 6/6/01 “Advanced Propulsion System Report”,...

Read More

Aerospace Power Scholarly Research

Posted by on Oct 24, 2009 in Aircraft, Contracts, Distributed Heterogeneous Simulation, Paul Krause, Power Systems, Propulsion, SBIR Phase III | 0 comments

Type of Award: SBIR Phase III, CPFF, Level of Effort (LOE)/Delivery Order (DO) Contract Number: F33615-99-D-2974 Lead-In Phase II: F33615-99-C-2911 Awards: DO 001: Modeling and Simulation Baseline, 9/20/99 DO 002: Simulation of Control Challenge Problem – Electric Power Networks Efficiency and Security (EPNES) Initiative, 8/12/02 DO 003: Aircraft Engine and Subsystem Modeling, 2/28/03 DO 004: Subsystems Design and Analysis, 10/21/02 DO 005: Distributed Heterogeneous Simulation of a UAV DO 006: Propulsion and Power Simulation, 9/30/03 DO 007: Distributed Heterogeneous Simulation Using EASY 5 for UNIX Operating System, 11/25/03 Total Funding to Subcontractors: Rolls-Royce and Northrop Grumman Agencies: U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Status: Completed Period: 9/20/99 to 3/14/05 Principal Investigator: Paul Krause Brief Description and Purpose: In the mid to late 1990’s, PC Krause and Associates (PCKA), Purdue University, the University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR), and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) had been extensively involved, as a group, in research, analysis, simulation, and design of power-electronic based systems for government agencies (Navy, Air Force, NASA, and the Army) interested in the more-electric initiative program. This group, of which PCKA was the small business arm, evolved naturally from a need to combine expertise in order to conduct the required work which has involved a large spectrum of power/drive systems ranging from spacecraft to tactical vehicles. The commonalities that exist between these many systems in configuration and components became very apparent. This sole-source contract was the first effort by the Air Force to encourage interagency interaction in sharing the results of the research and engineering projects common to aircraft power systems and to provide a convenient funding vehicle to encourage shared funding, among these agencies, for projects of mutual interest. DO 001 Reports: The Final Report contains a listing of 80 ACSL computer models that were done for DOD up to 9/18/00 DO 002 Reports: “Power System Control Development (ONR IPS Testbed Simulink Models and Documentation)”, 3/15/03 DO 003 Reports: “Subsystems Design and Analysis: Aircraft Engine and Subsystem Modeling”, 1/30/04 “Global Hawk Power System Simulation (Rolls-Royce Software)” 7/3/03 DO 004 Reports: “Integrated Propulsion and Power System Modeling, Simulation and Analysis (IPPoSMo)”, (Northrop Grumman), 8/29/03 “Integrated Propulsion and Power System Modeling, Simulation and Analysis (IPPoSMo)”, Final Report, (PCKA and Northrop Grumman), 1/30/04 DO 005 Reports: “Distributed Heterogeneous Simulation of a UAV Power System”1/14/05 DO 006 Reports: “Propulsion and Power Simulation (Scramjet Propulsion)”, 11/15/04 DO 007 Reports: “Distributed Heterogeneous Simulation Using EASY 5 for UNIX Operating System”,...

Read More